adobe photoshop help bottons Cheap Adobe Contribute CS4 adobe photoshop nonprofit software adobe photoshop grunge brush download Cheap Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection for Mac adobe photoshop cs8 mac osx adobe photoshop tips paths Cheap Adobe Dreamweaver CS5 adobe photoshop product license has expired adobe creative suite standard full Cheap Adobe Photoshop CS5 adobe photoshop c2 download adobe photoshop professional download Cheap Adobe Dreamweaver CS4 for Mac crack adobe photoshop free adobe creative suite test bank Cheap Adobe Dreamweaver CS3 adobe creative suite crack activation adobe photoshop cs3 activation code Cheap Adobe Creative Suite 4 Web Premium for Mac adobe contribute 4 torrent adobe photoshop 7.0 tutorial Cheap Adobe Creative Suite 4 Web Standard for Mac free adobe photoshop elements download legal adobe photoshop magazine Cheap Adobe Creative Suite 4 Production Premium for Mac photoshop adobe kids adobe photoshop cs2 user manual Cheap Adobe Creative Suite 4 Production Premium adobe photoshop cs3 key digital filmtools 55mm for adobe photoshop Cheap Adobe Creative Suite 4 Design Standard for Mac adobe creative suite photoshop illustrator free adobe photoshop cs3 trial Cheap Adobe Creative Suite 4 Design Premium for Mac adobe photoshop registration numbers 5.0 le adobe photoshop cs key Cheap Adobe Creative Suite 4 Design Premium tutor for adobe dreamweaver adobe photoshop for ubuntu Cheap Adobe Creative Suite 3 Web Premium free download adobe photoshop album adobe photoshop elements 4.0 trial Cheap Adobe Creative Suite 3 Design Premium what is adobe creative suites

Archive for October, 2009

Oct 29 2009

Chinese President Calls for Building Harmonious World

Published by mgopin under China,overseas aid,peace process

I found this fascinating in this little noticed speech. The Chinese president repeatedly used the words harmonious, common, mutual. Everything was about one integrated world operating together. We all know the problem with Chinese repression of the Tibetan people, and of their own best writers and journalists. The flip side of an emphasis on the positive idea of harmony is the negative reality of tyranny. The flip side of freedom is chaos and anarchy. Nevertheless, I think it is interesting that there is a kind of outgoing new emphasis in the rhetoric, a conscious decision to at least rhetorically move beyond the Wall of China. This is good, and it provides an opening to discuss the ethics of harmony and mutuality, especially in Confucian terms, which always requires MUTUAL respect between governors and the governed. I hope there is more open debate as time goes on with Chinese leaders in order to set the stage for a more ethical authentically Confucian approach to Chinese rule over 1 billion people.

Chinese president calls for building harmonious world

chinese president

Chinese President Hu Jintao put forward a four-point proposal on building a harmonious world on Wednesday, calling on the international community to work together for world peace and development.

During his speech at the general debate of the 64th session of the UN General Assembly, Hu said the trend towards peace, development and cooperation has grown stronger than ever in the world.

Meanwhile, he noted that the instability and uncertainties in the international landscape pose “severe challenges” to world peace and development.

In the face of unprecedented opportunities and challenges, members of the international community should continue the joint endeavor “to build a harmonious world of enduring peace and common prosperity and contribute to the noble cause of peace and development of mankind,” he said.

Read the rest of the article from China View here.

No responses yet

Oct 25 2009

After 40 Years of Wilderness, J Street Meets at the River’s Edge: Pro-Peace, Pro-Israel

After 40 Years of Wilderness, J Street Meets at the River’s Edge: Pro-Peace, Pro-Israel
By Rabbi Arthur Waskow

waskow-244x300

Tonight and for the next few days, in Washington DC, 1200 people are gathering in the name of a “pro-Israel, pro-peace” US policy. Because of my broken leg, I can’t be physically there. But my mind and spirit and 40 years of my work are there today.

Forty years ago, in the summer of 1969, I visited Israel for the first time. On the same trip, guided by a brilliant Israeli kibbutznik-sociologist, Dan Leon, I also visited Palestinian leaders in Hebron, East Jerusalem, and Gaza — old-fashioned notables, social workers, lawyers.

To a person, they told me they had marched and spoken out against occupation by Jordan or Egypt, and would oppose occupation by Israel. They said they had no objection to Israel as it had been before the 1967 war. They wanted to be citizens of a free Palestine, at peace with Israel and Jordan and everyone else.

I saw an occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem that was still relatively mild. (There were as yet, in the areas I visited, no Israeli settlers grabbing Palestinian land.) But I came back to America knowing this occupation was deeply dangerous. I knew this as a secular historian, and I knew it as a Jew who had just rediscovered the power and truth of the Passover Seder – that call to liberation from all pharaohs, all occupations.

This is what I knew: No occupation by one people over another, against its will, can be mild forever. Sooner or later, fury will rise in those occupied and arrogance in those who occupy. Resistance is inevitable — probably violent, just barely possibly nonviolent. And violent repression is almost inevitable.

So I organized a network of peace activists – some Jews and some not — Dr. Benjamin Spock, Rabbis Arthur Green and Arnold Jacob Wolf, Denise Levertov and Stewart Meacham, Abbie Hoffman and John Ruskay, Michael Lerner and myself (neither of us yet rabbis) — to place a statement in the New York Review of Books calling for a peace settlement between Israel and a Palestinian state.

We were then and for years a voice crying in the wilderness, against rage from the Israeli government and from many pro-Arab activists who urged a “one-state secular democratic Palestine,” and contempt or indifference from all American and Jewish officialdom.

Why am I mentioning this ancient history? Precisely because it was 40 years ago. Now, today, the biblical “40 years in the Wilderness” later, J Street has organized and 20 other organizations, including The Shalom Center, are participating in an historic pro-peace conference in Washington DC, with 1200 people taking part and dozens of Members of Congress joining as hosts.

All 21 groups are calling on a rhetorically friendly US government to push not only for a two-state peace settlement but one joined by all the Arab states. To do so even though that means dealing with a divided Palestinian leadership and a hostile Israeli government. Some of us would say the US should not just mouth support for that peace settlement but insist on it. Use its clout to insist on it.

Will the Obama Administration fulfill its lofty rhetoric? Not yet clear. What would make that happen?

Public demand. Insistence by enough Americans to matter. Americans who care enough to insist.

If my auto accident were not preventing my speaking at J Street, this is what I’d be saying:

That there are only two clusters of Americans who care enough about the Middle East to make a difference.

One is Big Oil and its allies the Cowboy Neo-Cons who foisted the Iraq war upon us. That difference was a disaster.

And the other is passionate Jews, passionate Christians, and passionate Muslims who view as sacred the region walked by Abraham, Hagar, and Sarah, and who have deep ties of spirit and emotion to their brothers and sisters in that region.

Of course we know that some of the passionate Christians, far from seeking peace in the footsteps of the Jesus who said to his own follower, “Whoever lifts the sword dies by the sword,” seek the Great Armageddon War and worship their version of a Killer Christ who will with sword and H-bomb murder all unbelievers.

Some of the passionate Jews seek not the renewal of Jewish culture or their own safety in the everyday joys of Shalom, Peace, that the rabbis taught as the very Name and essence of God — but worship the military might of a State with 200-plus nuclear weapons that can win military control of every foot of land that any biblical verse might have named as Israelite.

Some of the passionate Muslims are so consumed with rage against the Crusades and colonialism of centuries past and the oppressions and occupations of today that they cannot bear the notion of living in peace with former enemies, cannot celebrate the One Who says in the Quran, “I made the many peoples not to despise each other but to know the inner richness of the many different faces of the One.”

For we know, “the worst are full of passionate intensity.”

But so can also be the best. We need an Abrahamic Alliance of the passionate best.

The idolatry of worshipping force and violence, war and terrorism, takes root when there is too little energy devoted to the Infinite.

The Abrahamic Alliance that I call for will need to shape a political majority to back up a nervous, hesitant, peace-wishing President.

But that is not all. It must be rooted in passion for the One Who is Infinite, Whose Infinity shines only in the rainbow of diversity, and Who cannot be served by violence – even, and especially, violence in the name of that One or of Its followers.

May those who are gathering in Washington tonight, and all who thirst for peace and who hunger for freedom find a welcome in the Open Tent of Abraham, Hagar, and Sarah.

Shalom, salaam, peace!

– Arthur

Read more of Rabbi Waskow’s writing here and here, and check out more information about the J Street Conference at their website.

One response so far

Oct 24 2009

Israel welcomes peace agreement between Turkey and Armenia

Published by mgopin under Israel,Turkey,peace process

hillary

From the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesperson’s Bureau:

Israel welcomes the signing of an historic peace agreement between Turkey and Armenia. The agreement, which was signed by the foreign ministers of the two states on Saturday (10 October 2009), proves once again that open, brave and direct dialogue is the only way to overcome controversies and past fears and to make a new start towards a better future.

Israel hopes that the peace agreement will lead the entire region into a period of peace and cooperation.

This is a terrific development and I hope the pace of reconciliation efforts takes hold. But things are very complicated in Turkey.  Prime Minister Erdogan has to balance his embrace of former adversaries of Turkey while keeping allies. He must embrace Arab causes such as the rights of Palestinians without humiliating Israeli leaders. Turkey can be the bridge between the West and the Middle East, between Muslims and non-Muslims, between secular and religious, but it is a delicate balancing act, and I fear for the future if former allies are so incensed at mistreatment that they attempt to capitalize on divisions in Turkey. It is vital for the future of the region that Turkey’s future be nonviolent, and it is vital for the rapprochement with Armenia to take hold as a symbol of healing past wounds, grievances, and even major atrocities. I am glad that Israel congratulated Turkey, and I hope there are lessons learned about the courage it took Erdogan to face the past enough with Armenians to get this far in repairing the relationship. From what I understand things are moving forward with Kurds as well, in addition to what is publicly seen in the new Syrian/Turkish relationship. But for Erdogan to succeed he must successfully bring along Israel and its supporters, or at least bring along the progressive wing of Israeli supporters. The region cannot afford an all out break between Israel and Turkey, and many Turks will not stand for it either. Complicated but in some ways hopeful. P.S. Hail to Hillary for doing some terrific diplomacy.

No responses yet

Oct 18 2009

Peace Steps – Episode 5

Published by mgopin under Israel,Palestine,peace process

By Mallory Huggins

In the latest installment of Peace Steps, Marc and Aziz talk about what it means to be pro-Israel or pro-Palestine:

Watch more ICAR TV here.

3 responses so far

Oct 18 2009

Curiosity over Assumptions: Interfaith Meets a New Generation

By Mallory Huggins

On Speaking of Faith, a weekly public radio program, Krista Tippett focuses on “religion, meaning, ethics, and ideas.” This week, she talked with two women who illustrate the power of interfaith collaboration. Here’s an excerpt from the blog post about the women:

The Power of Listening and Engaging with the “Other”
By Krista Tippett

newsletter-leadshow

Malka and Aziza work with emerging leaders from different spheres of life and from both of their traditions. They make a core commitment “not to be enemies.” And that, of course, is the kind of lofty statement that can be hard to put into practice against the backdrop of reality. The ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the dynamics of the post-9/11 world, the rise of Iran as a regional power — these are just a few of the developments that infuse and shape relationships between Jews and Muslims everywhere.

To read the whole article, click here, and to download the audio version of the interview, click here.

No responses yet

Oct 16 2009

Christians (and Controversy) Descend on Israel for Sukkot

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jewlicious/2945647281/in/set-72157608079160998/

Christiane Marie Sarah writes on Jewcy about the complexity of the Christian Jewish Relations and the importance of new ways of engagement:

Jerusalem was busy last week as thousands descended on the city for Sukkot and the annual Jerusalem March. This year’s march drew around 70,000 people, up from the 35,000 who participated in 2008. 20,000 police stood by on Tuesday to oversee the controversial event, after what has already been a tense week in Jerusalem. Thousands of Christians also took part in the march, attending as part of a Feast of Tabernacles celebration hosted by the International Christian Embassy of Jerusalem (ICEJ).

Christian presence is a by now a familiar part of the Sukkot milieu, but Israelis have yet to decide what to make of these “friends of Israel.” Rabbi Tovia Singer has warned that the Christian congregants want to “prey on” rather than “pray for” Israel, and in 2007 the Chief Rabbinate forbade Jews from taking part in the march and other events with ICEJ presence. Minister of Tourism Stash Misezhnikov, however, has justified the event, stating that the Feast of Tabernacles is the largest annual tourist event in Israel, and is expected to generate between $16 and 18 million in revenue.

Who are these “Christian Zionists,” and should they be welcomed by Israelis? These questions return each year, and have also surfaced occasionally during events like the death of Christian fundamentalist Jerry Falwall in 2007. Israeli journalist Evan Goldstein at the time pointed out that “philo-Semites, like Falwell, seem to relate to Jews more as mythical figures from the Bible than as real living, breathing people.” His analysis was based on the thoughts of German philosopher Ernst Bloch, who wrote that a “philo-Semite is an anti-Semite that loves Jews.”

To read the complete article, click here.

No responses yet

Oct 16 2009

Marc’s Sideline: A “run-in” with Michael Moore

Published by davidv under Uncategorized

We all know Marc as a noted scholar and spiritual peacemaker, but I bet most of you didn’t know about his other artistic sideline…..

make sure you watch both videos!

No responses yet

Oct 14 2009

Recent Book Talk in Toronto

I had a wonderful experience  recently in Toronto. This is a photo of my book talk at Indigo Books, where I spoke on my recently published To Make the Earth Whole: the Art of Citizen Diplomacy. I had been invited up by the Mosaic Institute to speak on a panel on the state of Middle East peace, together with Fawaz Gerges and Bessma Momani. The event was terrific, but the book talk was also fun because Hind brought so many of her good friends in Toronto, and we were able to celebrate with friends our work together in Syria.

hind marc

No responses yet

Oct 13 2009

It’s time to nominate a peacemaker!

By Mallory Huggins

From the Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding:

logo

Dear Friends,

PeacemakersInAction.org is ready to receive your nomination for the next Peacemakers in Action andWomen’s Peace Initiative awardees.

Visit Tanenbaum’s new website and learn how to identify and honor religiously motivated peacemakers risking their lives in zones of armed conflict. Nominations accepted through November 30th!

Remember:

The Peacemakers in Action Award honors a man or woman motivated by religion to work for peace in an armed conflict – anywhere in the world.

The Women’s Peace Initiative Award honors a woman from Middle East-North Africa motivated by religion to work for peace in her region.

The Peacemakers in Action program supports religious peacemakers with the following benefits:

1. Increased public recognition for their efforts and achievements

2. $15,000 to reinforce their work

3. Expert training

4. An in-depth case study on their religious peacemaking work

5. The opportunity to help create and participate in a worldwide practitioners’ network

Help support the work of relatively unknown peacemakers on the ground. Spread the word about this call for nominations. And visit PeacemakersInAction.org today!

We thank you,

Joyce S. Dubensky
Executive Vice President & CEO

Heather Dubois
Assistant Program Director, Religion and Conflict Resolution

No responses yet

Oct 12 2009

A VITAL EXCHANGE ON A ‘JEWISH’ STATE: ABU SARAH AND BEN YEHUDA

Published by mgopin under Uncategorized

This is a critical exchange and should by everyone grappling with this issue.

Ever since his June speech at Bar-Ilan University, Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu has made it clear that peace with the Palestinians is conditioned on the latter accepting Israel as a Jewish state.

During his much-lauded address at the United Nations, Netanyahu reiterated his position:

“We ask the Palestinians to finally do what they have refused to do for 62 years: Say yes to a Jewish state. As simple, as clear, as elementary as that. Just as we are asked to recognize a nation-state for the Palestinian people, the Palestinians must be asked to recognize the nation-state of the Jewish people.”

The Palestinians, for their part, have rejected Netanyahu’s position. Their claim rests on three assertions: It is not the business of Palestinians to recognize the Jewish nature of Israel. Such recognition would endanger the rights of Palestinian citizens of Israel. Acknowledging the Jewish state would negate the Palestinian right of return.

So, should the Palestinians accept a Jewish State? Israeli and Palestinian writers Roi Ben-Yehuda and Aziz Abu Sarah got together to explore the topic. The following is their exchange.

Ben-Yehuda: Aziz, I am happy to have the opportunity for this exchange with you. I will start off this discussion by stating that I think Netanyahu’s position (which was first articulated by Ehud Olmert and Tzipi Livni) is a good one.

I support this position because it provides the Palestinians a real opportunity to put their cards on the table: To state in an unequivocal fashion that they are ready to make peace with Israel, i.e. to renounce the right of return which is incompatible with a two-state solution.

I also support this position because recognizing Israel as a Jewish state will go a long way toward allaying some of the basic existential fears of the Israeli people. In so doing, it will enable the government to conduct negotiations without fearing that concessions will lead to loss of identity or security (not to mention loss of political power back home).

I say this as an unapologetic Zionist and peacenik – as someone who believes that both the Jews and the Palestinians by virtue of being a people with deep historic ties to the land have a right to a state in part of Israel/Palestine.

Abu Sarah: Roi, you are right that recognition is important to allay the fears of Israelis, but Netanyahu’s demand is not a fair request. Palestinians still don’t even have a state as a direct result of Israel’s creation and the subsequent occupation of the West Bank. Equal recognition means the Palestinian recognition of Israel’s right to existence and Israeli recognition of Palestinians’ right to a state.

Recognizing Israel as a Jewish state would require a change of the Palestinian narrative and identity and would affect the rights of Palestinians citizens of Israel. Furthermore, such recognition before a just solution to the Palestinian refugee problem would dishonor the suffering of these refugees. Palestinians would be accepting the right of return of Jews who never lived in the land over those who were expelled from it.

Israel has peace agreements with Jordan and Egypt, yet neither of them had to recognize Israel as a Jewish State. These agreements have been successful regardless.

See the full text here.

No responses yet

Next »